An analysis of the Lake Surface Water Temperature evolution of the world’s largest lakes during the years 2003-2020 using MODIS data

An analysis of the Lake Surface Water Temperature evolution of the world’s largest lakes during the years 2003-2020 using MODIS data

José Antonio Sobrino

*,

Susana García-Monteiro

,

Yves Julien


Global Change Unit. Image Processing Laboratory, University of Valencia. C/ Catedrático José Beltrán, 2. 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain.

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.



Abstract

The Lake Surface Water Temperature (LSWT) evolution is analysed in ten of the largest lakes in the world: Caspian Sea, Superior, Victoria, Huron, Michigan, Tanganyika, Baikal, Great Slave Lake, Erie and Ontario. The time span selected is 2003-2020 and the satellite product, MODIS Level 3 SST Thermal IR 8 Day 4km V2019.0. Results show warming trends ranging from 0.012⁰C/yr. in the Victoria Lake to 0.083 ⁰C/yr in the Baikal Lake. Results have been validated with the product MOD11L2 LSWT estimations for the years 2003-2014 in the Laurentian Great Lakes, obtaining correlations between 0.962 and a 0.998. The validation has been enlarged by considering Sentinel 3 observations from the Issyk-Kul lake, with a 0.99 correlation. The validation shows that the MODIS SST product is capable of estimating the LSWT parameter with a high precision.

Keywords

Lake Surface Water Temperature, largest lakes, MODIS, trend
  1. INTRODUCTION

Lake Surface Water Temperature (LSWT) is recognized as an Essential Climate Variable (ECV) by the Global Observing System for Climate (GCOS, 2016), just as the well-known Sea Surface Temperature (SST) or Land Surface Temperature (LST). It has been proved that the behaviour of these ECVs associated to temperature condition several processes, such as the fisheries’ presence and catches (Gamito et al., 2015), the alternation between rainy and dry seasons (Liu et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2001) or the climatic oscillations dynamics (McPhaden et al., 2006; Lindsey and Dahlman, 2009). For this reason, it is crucial to monitor ECVs, in order to better understand these processes, among others, and be prepared to face the changes they may face.

Focusing on LSWT, it is an indicator of how climate change could affect the lake physical dynamics and aquatic ecosystems worldwide. Previous works report that warming lake temperature trends lead to changes in the water column density that are strongly correlated with an increase in average air temperatures over time, with clear effects on the thermal regime. Stainsby et al. (2011) developed a research in this field in a regional lake in Canada, whereas Lofgren et al. (2000) focused on the Great Lakes; the ice cover duration is shortening in German lakes (Livingstone and Adrian, 2009); Eliott et al. (2006) tested the sensitivity of phytoplankton communities to changes in water temperature and nutrient load, predicting that cyanobacteria had the potential to dominate the phytoplankton community, with consequences on water quality. This dominance was greatest at high water temperatures.

Furthermore, the LSWT has traditionally been estimated by using in situ instruments, heterogeneous, irregularly distributed and differently calibrated (De Santis et al., 2021; Sobrino et al., 2020a). Remote sensing solves these in situ measurements disadvantages and provides continuous temporal series data, retrieved from the same sensor observations, with a given uncertainty, the identical for each observation. As a consequence, it is becoming increasingly common to find in the literature studies whose objective is to analyze the LSWT from satellite data (Ghasemifar et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2014; Crosman and Horel, 2009).

It is clear that LSWT is a variable to consider when studying lakes and has more implications than simple variations in lake temperatures. For this reason, we propose to develop a study that considers the most representative lakes in the world, to know their LSWT behaviour during the last years, from 2003 to 2020, by using MODIS data. The lakes selected are: the Caspian Sea, Superior, Victoria, Huron, Michigan, Tanganyika, Baikal, Great Slave, Erie and Ontario lakes.

The aim of this paper is to retrieve the LSWT of the ten lakes mentioned above by using MODIS Level 3 SST Thermal IR 8 Day 4km V2019.0 product in order to show how it  functions when estimating surface temperature of freshwater extensions non-connected to the open water. Our results will be validated by a previous study focused on the Laurentian Great Lakes and which uses an LST MODIS product (Moukomla and Blanken, 2016). Furthermore, LSWT trends will be estimated to analyze the behaviour of this parameter during the last years.

  1. STUDY SITES

Ten large lakes have been selected for developing this study: the Caspian Sea, the only saline lake included; the Superior, Michigan, Huron, Ontario and Erie Lakes, called the Great Lakes, which occupy part of the territory of the United States of America and Canada; the Victoria and Tanganyika lakes, located in the African continent; the Baikal lake in Russia and the Slave lake in Canada (table 1) (Dumont, 2003; United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2022; Swain and Shannon, 1980; Verburg, P. et al., 2003; Zimmerman et al., 2006).

Table 1. Metric characteristics of the ten lakes considered in the study.

LakeContinentArea(km2)Volume(km3)Maximum depth(m)
Caspian SeaAsia371,00078,2001,025
SuperiorAmerica82,10012,100406.3
VictoriaAfrica68,8702,75084
HuronAmerica59,6003,540229
MichiganAmerica58,0004,900281
TanganyikaAfrica32,60018,9001,470
BaikalAsia31,50023,6001,620
SlaveAmerica27,0001,560614
ErieAmerica25,70048964
OntarioAmerica18,9601,639244

Our first study site, the Caspian Sea, is the largest lake of the world and, although it has no connections to ocean waters, its salinity is of 12.58 parts per thousand on average (Owen et al, 2021), ranging from 1 part per thousand near the Volga mouth to values over 200 parts per thousand in the Kara-Bogaz-Gol (figure 1). This fact prevents it from being considered a purely freshwater extension.

Figure 1. The Caspian Sea. Salinity varies from 1 part per thousand to 200 parts per thousand from the Volga River mouth to the Kara-Bozaz-Gol, respectively (own elaboration).

The Great Lakes are the set integrated by the Superior, Michigan, Huron, Ontario an Erie lakes (figure 2) and cover a total area of 244,360 km2 as can be observed in table 1. Due to its areal extension and depth, the Great Lakes play a large role in the surface climate of the region, influencing its dynamic over the course of the seasons (Moukomla and Blanken, 2016).

Figure 2. In the upper-left, the North-American Great Lakes: Superior, Huron, Michigan, Erie and Ontario. In the bottom, the Slave Lake

Lake Victoria is the largest freshwater lake in Africa, being the source of the Nile and providing water for domestic, agricultural, industrial and livestock purposes. Its water bathe the shores of Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda (Awange and Omg’ang’a, 2006). The other African lake analysed, is be the Tanganyika Lake, which has historically supported one of the world’s more productive pelagic fisheries, specifically, provides the 25-40% animal protein supply for the populations of the surrounding countries (O’Reilly et al., 2003) (figure 3).

Figure 3. African lakes included in the study: Tanganyka Lake and Vicoria Lake (own elaboration)

The Baikal Lake, located on the Asian continent, is the oldest and deepest in the world (figure 4). It has been designed by the UNESCO as a World Heritage Site and cited as the “most outstanding example of a freshwater ecosystem (Wann et al., 2020). There is already evidence of warming and local eutrophication of the water column (Izmest’eva et al., 2016).

Figure 4. The Baikal Lake (own elaboration).

  1. MATERIAL & METHODS
  1.  Data sets

The product used in this study is MODIS Level 3 SST Thermal IR 8 Day 4km V2019.0, which is fully and freely available in https://podaac.jpl.gov. Images are available at a processing Level 3 for daily, 8-days, monthly and annual timespans. As 8-days composites are an average of the daily data available for each 8-days period, they have been considered as ideal for this work, as they allow both to save storage capacity and to reduce computational costs.

3450 images have been computed for the years 2003-2020 (1723 images associated to MODIS-Terra and 1727 images associated to MODIS-Aqua). Each image is a global dataset with a spatial resolution of 4.63 km and 8640×4320 pixels dimensions. A mask has been applied in order to consider only the area corresponding to each lake, step that will be explained with more detail in the methodology section.

The algorithm of the MODIS SST product used in this work uses seven latitudinal bands in 20⁰ intervals from 0⁰ to 60⁰ and then, a single interval from 60⁰ to the poles (Kilpatrick et al, 2019; Jia, 2019; Jia and Minett, 2020) for setting coefficients for the different atmospheric regions at a certain month of the year. These coefficients are continuously updated and validated by the Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science (RSMAS) at the University of Miami (Brown and Minnett, 1999). The product applies the long-wave algorithm, which considers MODIS bands 31 and 32 at 11 μm and 12 μm, respectively (Goddard Space Flight Center, 2014).  

It is vital to have clear the uncertainties associated to any climatic data when developing global change studies. The product’s Algorithm Technical Background Document (ATBD) establishes an uncertainty of 0.45K at nadir and 0.56K at 45⁰. Several researchers have validated the MODIS SST product at global and regional scales: Sobrino et al. (2020a) estimated de global Sea Surface Temperature (SST) with a median evaluated uncertainty of 0.10 in the period 2003-2016; Reinart and Reinhold (2008) obtained errors of 0.40⁰C when applying the product to Swedish lakes by using MODIS-Terra images and considering the period 2001-2003.

  1.  Methodology

The methodology applied is based on the one proposed by Sobrino et al. (2020b) to estimate SST at a global level and which has been shown to be valid at regional scales too (García-Monteiro et al., 2022).

As a first step, a mask for each lake considered has been elaborated and applied, in order to include in computations only de study sites selected. Once the different regions of interest are cropped, the SST is estimated applying the methodology mentioned above.

For each lake, the monthly and annual SST have been computed as shown in Eq. 1, where SSTlaket is the SST for each lake at a certain time, t; SSTijt, the SST for each pixel ij at a time t; m is the column pixel dimension and n, the row pixel dimension; Aij, is the area of every pixel of i,j dimensions and Alake, the total area of each lake, only considering cloud free pixels.


   

 

For each 8-day period, four observations are considered, Terra and Aqua, daytime and nighttime, whose passing times are the following: 10:30, 13:30, 22:30 and 01:30. For each lake, the four data average has been calculated according to Eq. 2. (Mao et al., 2017). The timespan selected starts in the year 2003 because, despite Terra provides data since 2001, Aqua wan launched in 2002 and did not made data available until the year 2003. Therefore, the first complete year, with four measures per image is 2003.

   

                                                 

The product ATBD assesses the pixel quality through the Quality Control variable. We have taken this information into account an only included on computations those pixels of good or acceptable quality, meaning Quality Control values of 0 and 1, respectively. Furthermore, an additional filter has been applied to results with the aim or removing outliers based on the Z-score method. Linear regressions have been used to estimate trends and develop validations. In addition, the Sen’s slope method and Mann-Kendal test have been run out to estimate trends with an associated level of confidence.

  1. RESULTS & DISCUSSION

4.1. Validation

Our MODIS results have been validated with Moukomla and Blanken (2016) results. They estimated the Great Lakes Surface Temperature from the 6th of July 2001 and the 31st of December 2014 by merging skin temperature derived from the MODIS Land Surface Temperature (MOD11L2) and the MODIS Cloud product (MOD06L2). They validated their temperature estimations with in situ data from buoys belonging to the NOAA National Data Buoy Center, obtaining R-squared values ranging from 0.4975 to 0.9560 from regressions.

Figure 5 shows the regressions carried out considering our results respect the Moulomla and Blanken (2016) paper results. Correlations between both data sets are in the interval of 0.962-0.998, demonstrating, on one hand, that the retrievals of both products are in the same line and on the other, that our methodology is capable of generating valid SST estimations in lake water surfaces.

 Figure 5. Results validation. MODIS SST products monthly estimations are compared with the results of Moukomla and Blanken (2016) for the Great Leaks. The timespan considered is 2003-2014. The correlation coefficients obtained ranges between 0.962 and 0.998.
Our validation is extended by considering Hernández-Galindo (2022) work which uses Sentinel’s 3 SLSTR data to estimate monthly LSWT of the Issyk-Kul lake, in Kyrgyzstan for the year 2020 (figure 6). We have reproduced their methodology to estimate the lake’s LSWT but using MODIS SST product data. As the SLSTR observations are made between 10 and 11 a.m., only Terra’s diurnal images have been used, whose passing time is 10:30 a.m. 

Figure 6. Monthly LSWT for the Issyk-Kul lake in the year 2020 for the MODIS and SLSTR SST estimations (left). Linear regression for both products (right).

It must be mentioned that all the values used in this validation are from satellite retrievals and not in situ measurements. In this way, we are working with skin SST in every case, not bulk SST, avoiding the SST variations throughout the water column due to the SST stratification phenomenon (Minett and Kaiser-Weiss, 2012).

The correlation between MODIS and SLSTR retrieved SST data for year 2020 is 0.99, indicating the clear symmetry between SST estimates from the two datasets. The bias is 0.33⁰C, lower than the MODIS SST product uncertainty at nadir established by its ATBD.   The difference between standard deviation of both datasets is 0.35⁰C, lower than the error  commented above. For this reason, we consider that MODIS Level 3 SST Thermal IR 8 Day 4km V2019.0 product is capable of estimating LSWT at a high precision and the results shown in this paper are reliable.

4.2 Lake Surface Water Temperature in ten of the largest lakes of the world

Once the reliability of the MODIS SST product for LSWT estimations has been established, LSWT trends for the years 2003-2020 have been estimated for the Caspian Sea, Superior, Victoria, Huron, Michigan, Tanganyika, Baikal, Great Slave Lake, Erie and Ontario by both the linear and Sen’s slope methods. The confidence level is offered by carrying out the Mann-Kendal test. The mean LSWT for the whole timespan is also provided (table 2).

The MODIS Level 3 SST Thermal IR 8 Day 4km V2019.0 provides complete data (including four daily measures) from 2003 onwards. AVHRR enables a more comprehensive data period for both LST and SST variables but, in contrast, their satellites induce variability due to their orbital drift (Price, 1990; Sobrino et al., 2008 Julien and Sobrino, 2012). For this reason, MODIS time series have been selected for this study in detriment of AVHRR. 

Positive trends are found in the ten lakes analysed (table 2) for both the linear and Sen’s slope trend estimation methods. The higher LSWT trend estimated is found for Lake Baikal, 0.083⁰C/yr at a 99.79% confidence level, whereas the lower trend is found in Lake Victoria, 0.012⁰C/yr. Results show a high Mann-Kendall level (>95%) in the case of the Tanganyka and Erie lakes, with warming rates of 0.017⁰C/yr and 0.058⁰C/yr, respectively.

From the absolute LSWT values, the Tanganyka and Victoria lakes are the warmer lakes among the lakes considered and show the lower data variability through time, established by their standard deviations. These absolute LSWT are 25.76±0.18⁰C for the Victoria Lake and 26.95±0.16⁰C for the Tanganyka Lake. On the other hand, the colder lakes are represented by the Baikal Lake, 6.3±0.6⁰C, and the Superior Lake, 6.8±0.8⁰C.

Table 2. Annual trends estimated for the lakes analysed during the years 2003-2020 by the linear and Sen’s slope methods. The results’ confidence is given by the Mann-Kendal test (significant results are highlighted in bold).

LakeMean LSWT (C)Linear trend (C)Sen’s slope(C)Mann-Kendal (%)
Caspian Sea16.3±0.50.0370.04487.97
Superior6.8±0.80.0020.01337.76
Victoria25.76±0.180.0120.01272.85
Huron9.1±0.60.0310.02969.37
Michigan9.9±0.80.0250.02961.64
Tanganyika26.95±0.160.0150.01796.93
Baikal6.3±0.60.0820.08399.79
Slave6.9±0.70.0410.05678.88
Erie11.7±0.50.0430.05895.53
Ontario10.5±0.70.0430.04765.64

In figure 7, the annual LSWT means are shown. The higher difference between absolute annual temperatures are observed in Lake Baikal, reaching a 2.17⁰C variation between the years 2006 and 2020, matching with the higher warming rate estimated among the ten lakes, 0.083⁰C/yr. Previous studies have already documented that the high temperature increases in this lake have taken place for years: Hampton et al. (2008) estimated a 1.2⁰C increase during a sixty years timespan, 1946-2005, at a warming rate of 0.02⁰C/yr for this sixty years interval by using the MOD11A2 LST product. Our results imply that the trend has quadrupled for the 2003-2020 interval, indicating the magnitude of the LSWT trend for this lake,

On the other hand, the lowest annual variability is detected for lakes Victoria and Tanganyika, an expected scenario, as they are located in tropical latitudes, with a variation of 0.66⁰C and 0.62⁰C, respectively, between the lower annual mean (2008) and the higher (2020). Lower temporal variability is associated to lower warming rates: 0.012⁰C/yr in the Victoria lake case and 0.017⁰C/yr, for the Tanganyika lake. Kraemer et al. (2015) estimated LSWT trends for the Tanganyika lake, obtaining 0.016±0.008⁰C/yr calculated from in situ data and for the years 1985-2011. In this way, the trend remains practically constant through time.

O’Reilly et al. (2015) made the first worldwide synthesis of combined in situ and satellite data for 235 globally distributed lakes for the years 1985-2009, obtaining a mean LSWT trend of 0.034⁰C/yr. They pointed out that the LSWT warming rates are the result of the combination of both climatic and local characteristic and there is evidence of a rapid lake surface water warming. Our mean trend for the representative ten lakes selected is 0.038⁰C/yr and for a more recent period, 2003-2020. Despite the differences between O’Reilly et al. (2015) and this paper, the proximity of the trends obtained is worth noting.

Figure 7. Annual LSWT during the timespan 2003-2020 for the ten lakes considered in the study: Caspian Sea, Superior, Victoria, Huron, Michigan, Tanganyika, Baikal, Slave Lake, Erie and Ontario.

Sobrino et al. (2020b) established a global SST trend of 0.019⁰C/yr for the years 2003-2019. Assuming this value for the present timespan and attending to the Sen’s slope trends estimated in this paper, seven of the ten lakes analysed exceed this value: Caspian Sea (0.044⁰C/yr), Huron (0.029⁰C/yr), Michigan (0.029⁰C/yr),  Baikal (0.083⁰C/yr), Slave Lake (0.056⁰C/yr), Erie (0.058⁰C/yr) and Ontario (0.047⁰C/yr). In this way, the general overview shows that lakes are warming at a higher rate than the global water surfaces.

Absolute LSWT and trend maps are shown in figure 8 for the ten lakes considered. A high spatial variability for the LSWT parameter is shown, with a more intense warming effect near the lake’s shore, effect which is clearly observed for the Superior and Huron Lakes.

Absolute LSWT (⁰C)Trend (⁰C/yr)
Caspian Lake
Superior Lake










Victoria Lake
Huron Lake
Michigan Lake










Tanganyka Lake
Baikal Lake
Slave Lake
Erie Lake
Ontario Lake

Figure 8. Absolute LSWT and trends during the timespan 2003-2020 for the ten lakes considered in the study: Caspian Sea, Superior, Victoria, Huron, Michigan, Tanganyika, Baikal, Great Slave Lake, Erie and Ontario lakes.

The 8-days LSWT have been averaged into monthly mean temperatures associated to the period 2003-2020 to detect temperature and trend variability by months. In table 4, the mean LSWT, standard deviation, trend and Mann-Kendal confidence level are shown for each month.

The common behavior for lakes located in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) is to reach the maximum LSWT in the summer months of July and August, as it is clearly observed in the case of the Caspian Sea, Superior, Huron, Michigan, Baikal, Great Slave Lake, Erie and Ontario lakes. In the Southern Hemisphere, the maximum monthly averages are associated to March in the Tanganyika lake and to April in the Victoria lake. The Tanganyika lake has the highest estimated monthly temperature associated: 27.8±0.3⁰C. As it is expected, matching with the annual results, these lakes show the lower monthly standard deviations. 

On the other hand, the minimum monthly values take place in January, February or March for the NH lakes and in July for the SH lakes, denoting the well-known reverse seasonality between hemispheres. The minimum monthly value is registered for the Baikal lake in February, -0.4±0.3⁰C. According to Moukomla and Blanken (2016), surface temperature below 0⁰C may correspond to ice cover, which could be for liquid water surfaces by the sensor. Changes from minimum to maximum values are gradual through the months.

Stability in absolute LSWT values terms is observed in two pair of months: July and August for the Caspian Sea, Victoria, Tanganyika, Slave and Erie lakes and February and March for the Superior, Victoria, Huron, Michigan, Baikal, Slave and Ontario lakes.  These relative sable values are identified with minimum and maximum annual values. Changes from minimum to maximum LSWT values are gradual through the months.

Table 4. Monthly absolute LSWT and trends estimated for the lakes analysed during the years 2003-2020 by the linear and Sen’s slope methods. The results’ confidence is given by applying the Mann-Kendall test.

LakeParameterJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
CaspianT (⁰C)8.77.58.211.917.9323.426.426.5622.617.7713.3310.4
SD (⁰C)0.60.50.71.21.051.20.91.090.61.011.080.9
Trend (⁰C/yr.)0.016-0.0010.0660.0320.0600.1050.103-0.0330.011-0.042-0.053-0.002
MK (%)63.693.0296.2848.0483.9092.4998.3052.8426.6965.6483.909.05
SuperiorT (⁰C)2.21.000.91.73.68.013.916.113.89.56.23.8
SD (⁰C)0.60.60.70.80.91.32.21.61.61.20.80.5
Trend (⁰C/yr.)-0.0070.005-0.004-0.023-0.0230.0250.0600.013-0.0050.026-0.0300.011
MK (%)23.8220.923.0232.3150.4812.0565.6415.0220.9232.3169.3729.52
VictoriaT (⁰C)25.926.126.226.326.125.525.0025.0425.4125.7626.025.96
SD (⁰C)0.40.40.40.40.30.30.20.150.140.160.20.18
Trend (⁰C/yr.)-0.0110.0280.0200.0220.0130.0250.0230.0100.016-0.0060.0070.004
MK (%)45.5782.7563.6940.4269.3893.1197.9291.8999.0143.0571.1617.99
HuronT (⁰C)2.31.11.12.56.313.018.920.0617.2812.37.94.5
SD (⁰C)0.60.50.70.91.41.31.51.021.061.20.90.8
Trend (⁰C/yr.)0.0040.0300.107-0.0010.0750.0080.0560.0300.0070.050-0.0230.023
MK (%)3.0261.6423.826.0459.543.0245.5532.3123.8277.4637.7740.41
MichiganT (⁰C)3.071.902.003.376.9813.9319.9421.1418.1813.048.334.91
SD (⁰C)0.600.630.861.001.461.551.761.240.951.280.950.71
Trend (⁰C/yr.)0.0120.0270.013-0.0090.0400.0100.0940.0200.0260.027-0.0500.035
MK (%)29.5257.3720.9137.7648.043.0269.3637.7632.3148.0465.6463.68
TanganyikaT (⁰C)27.2527.5327.7827.6927.3726.5425.8025.8526.4827.0227.1627.18
SD (⁰C)0.240.280.360.330.380.280.200.160.160.160.240.17
Trend (⁰C/yr.)0.005-0.0010.0030.0140.0350.0170.0280.0200.01800.0190.016
MK (%)15.036.0417.9952.8597.7065.6899.8798.9495.93092.5289.69
BaikalT (⁰C)0.95-0.37-0.250.161.945.7613.0614.8210.766.443.871.98
SD (⁰C)0.380.690.260.280.551.091.901.641.270.540.360.26
Trend (⁰C/yr.)0.0080.65-0.0030.0160.0610.1320.2180.2100.1320.0360.0340.018
MK (%)37.779.0435.0895.5499.1199.4398.6298.8996.2875.9896.6275.99
SlaveT (⁰C)-0.400.040.110.391.226.1914.1614.129.775.642.590.83
SD (⁰C)1.640.380.330.210.281.561.411.411.240.750.430.77
Trend (⁰C/yr.)-0.004-0.0240.1410.0540.1200.033-0.0250.008
MK (%)37.7891.1991.1752.8386.0440.4157.3729.52
ErieT (⁰C)1.620.431.665.2411.4618.5523.3623.6320.4615.259.684.59
SD (⁰C)0.850.491.031.301.341.041.240.970.941.261.051.16
Trend (⁰C/yr.)0.0340.0370.0260.0150.002-0.0290.3780.7890.0700.093-0.0060.054
MK (%)45.5695.9337.7626.6812.0426.6983.9037.7678.8891.189.0455.14
OntarioT (⁰C)3.332.192.223.617.7515.2421.1622.0818.9813.668.625.27
SD (⁰C)0.590.600.851.031.921.581.550.971.001.150.850.79
Trend (⁰C/yr.)0.0130.0240.0240.0320.0380.0150.1140.0350.0630.0770.0150.041
MK (%)35.0657.3765.6552.8323.8215.0286.0443.0187.9694.669.0445.56

CONCLUSIONS

Lakes are freshwater enclosed extensions in which there is no exchange with open waters. For this reason, the initial hypothesis of this work was that they could suffer to a greater extent form the effect of global warming. Results show positive LSWT trend for the ten lakes considered: the Caspian Sea, Superior, Victoria, Huron, Michigan, Tanganyika, Baikal, Great Slave Lake, Erie and Ontario lakes.

Furthermore, when considering  the current SST warming rate, established in 0.018⁰C/yr for the whole sea surfaces, seven of these ten lakes exceed this trend. The sample size is limited enough to prevent generalizing that LSWT is warming at a higher rate than SST, but it can be affirmed that the LSWT of seven of the largest lakes of the world is increasing at an accelerated rate. The highest LSWT is found for Lake Baikal, with 0.083⁰C/yr, nearly five times the global SST trend, whereas the lowest trend is associated to Victoria Lake, with 0.012⁰C/yr.

LSWT trends have also been calculated by months for each lake with the aim of detecting possible monthly variability. Results show that warming rates are not homogeneous throughout the year and they are accentuated during the Northern Hemisphere summer months (June-July-August) for all the lakes, matching, as well, with the higher absolute LWST values of the Northern Hemisphere lakes. 

The MODIS Level 3 SST Thermal IR 8 Day 4km V2019.0 achieves SST retrieval by applying a specific SST algorithm. However, it also provides information about freshwater extension and this paper has demonstrated its functionality in this type of ecosystems. The validations carried out show correlations between 0.96 and 0.99 with results provided by previous literature. 

Remote sensing is a valuable technology which provides homogeneous and periodic data from the whole Earth’s surface. Its main disadvantage is the impossibility of collecting data below clouds. This weakness is overcome by the satellite temporal resolution that means 4 passes per day. The low uncertainty of results confirms its reliability, strengthened by the validation that has been carried out. 

The LSWT is positioned as a parameter of climatic interest, already recognized as an Essential Climate Variable by the World Meteorological Organization, which reflects global warming in an amplified way. As for other ECVs, such as SST, the LSWT must be continuously monitored, as it is an indicator of the behaviour of the surface temperature of the planet.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank the NASA Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center team for making MODIS data freely available. This research was funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (TIRSAT ESP2017-85770-R and PID2020-112494RB-I00 IPL-LSTM) and the Ministerio de Universidades (grant number FPU18/01239).

AUTOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Sobrino, J: Conceptualization; Julien, Y., García-Monteiro, S.: Data curation; Julien, Y., García-Monteiro: Formal analysis; Sobrino, J., García-Monteiro, S.: Funding acquisition; Julien, Y., García-Monteiro, Sobrino, J.: Investigation; Julien, Y.: Methodology; Sobrino. J.: Project administration; Sobrino, J.: Resources; Julien, Y.: Software; Julien, J.: Sobrino. J.: Supervision; Sobrino, J., García-Monteiro, S: Validation; García-Monteiro, S.: Visualization; García Monteiro, S.: Writing – original draft; Julien, Y., Sobrino, J., García-Monteiro, S.: Writing – review & editing

REFERENCES

Awange, J.L and Ong’ang’a, O. 2006. Lake Victoria. Ecology, Resources, Environment. Springer. Netherlands. ISBN: 3-540-32574-3.

Brown, B; Minnett, P.J. 1999. MODIS Infrared Sea Surface Temperature Algorithm. Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document. Version 2.0. University of Miami, Miami, United States of America.

Crosman, E.T., Horel, J.D. 2009. MODIS-derived surface temperature of the Great Salt Lake, Remote Sensing of Environment, 113 (1), pp. 73-81, ISSN 0034-4257, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.08.013

De Santis, D, Del Frate, F., Schiavon, G. 2022. Anlaysis of Climate Change Effects on Surface Temperature in Central-Italy Lakes Using Satellite Data Time-Series. Remote Sensing, 14, 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14010117

Dumont, H.J. The Caspian Lake: History, biota, structure, and function. Limnology and oceanography, 43(1), pp 44-52, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1998.43.1.0044

Elliott, J.A., Jones, I.D. and Thackeray, S.J. 2006. Testing the Sensitivity of Phytoplankton Communities to Changes in Water Temperature and Nutrient Load, in a Temperate Lake. Hydrobiologia, 559, 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-1233-y

Gamito, R., Teixeira, C.M., Costa, M.J., Cabral, H.N. Are regional fisheries’ catches changing with climate? Fisheries Research, 161, pp. 207-216, ISSN 0165-7836, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2014.07.014.

García-Monteiro, S; Sobrino, J.A.; Julien, Y.; Sòria, G.; Skokovic, D. 2021. Surface Temperature trends in the Mediterranean Sea from MODIS data during years 2003-2019. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 49 (2022) 102086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2021.102086

Ghasemifar, E., Farajzadeh, M., Mohammadi, C. and Alipoor, E. 2020. Long-term change of surface temperature in water bodies around Iran – Caspian Sea, Gulf of Oman, and Persian Gulf – using 2001–2015 MODIS data, Physical Geography, 41:1, 21-35, DOI: 10.1080/02723646.2019.1618231

Global Climate Observation System. 2016. Essential Climate Variables. Accessed on the 4th of February of 2022. Available in https://gcos.wmo.int/en/essential-climate-variables/about. Accessed in the 14h of February of 2022.

Goddard Space Flight Center. NASA, Ocean Ecology Laboratory, Ocean Biology Processing Group; (2014): MODIS-Terra Ocean Color Data;. Available in https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/dataprod/mod28.php

Hampton, S.E., Izmest’eva, L.R., Moore, M.V., Katz, S.L., Dennis, B., Silow, E.A. 2008. Sixty years of environmental change in the world’s largest freshwater lake – Lake Baikal, Siberia. Global Change Biology, 14 (8), pp. 1947-1958.

Izmest’eva, L.R. Moore, M.V., Hampton, S.E., Ferwerda, C.J., Gray, D.K., Woo, K.H., Pislegina, H.V., Krashchuk, L.S., Shimaraeva, S.V., Silow, E.A.. 2016. Lake-wide physical and biological trends associated with warming in Lake Baikal, Journal of Great Lakes Research, Volume 42(1), pp. 6-17, ISSN 0380-1330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2015.11.006.

Jia, C. 2019. Satellite Infrared Retrievals of Sea Surface Temperature at High Latitudes. MS Thesis, Meteorology and Physical Oceanography. University of Miami. Miami. FL, USA. pp. 79.

Jia, C., & Minnett, P.J. 2020. High Latitude Sea Surface Temperatures Derived from MODIS Infrared Measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment. 251 (2020), 112904.

Julien, Y.; Sobrino, J.A. 2012. Correcting Long Term Data Record V3 estimated LST from orbital drift effects. Remote Sens. Environ. 123, 207–219.

Kilpatrick, K. A., P. Minnett, B. Luo, (2019b). Validation of NASA MODIS R2019.0 reprocessed SST Products. The 18th International GHRSST Science Team Meeting (GHRSST XVIII) – Frascati Italy- 6th to 10th June 2019.

 Kraemer, B.M., Hook, S., Huttula, T., Kotilainen, P., O’Reilly, C.M., Peltonen, A., et al. (2015) Century-Long Warming Trends in the Upper Water Column of Lake Tanganyika. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0132490. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132490

Lindsay, R. and Dahlman, L. 2009. Climate Variability: North Atlantic Oscillation. Last update: October 2021. Available in https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-variability-north-atlantic-oscillation

Liu, Q., Zhang, S., Zhang, H., Bai, Y., Zhang, J. Monitoring drought using composite drought indices based on remote sensing, Science of The Total Environment, 711, 134585, ISSN 0048-9697, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134585.

Livingstone, D.M. and Adrian, R. 2009. Modelling the duration of intermittent ice cover on a lake for climate-change studies. Limnology Oceanography, 54(5), pp. 1709-1722.

Lofgren, B.M.; Zhu, Y.C. 2000. Surface energy fluxes on the great lakes based on satellite-observed surface temperatures 1992 to 1995. J. Great Lakes Res, pp. 26, 305–314

Mao K.B., Ma Y., Tan X.L., Shen X.Y., Liu G., Li Z.L., Chen J.M., Xia L. 2017. Global surface temperature change analysis based on MODIS data in recent twelve years Adv. Space Res., 59, pp. 503-551

McPhaden, M.J.; Zebiak, S.E.; Glantz, M.H. ENSO as an integrating concept in Earth Science. Science. 2006, 314 (5806), pp. 1740-1745. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132588

Minnett, P. and Kaiser-Weiss, A. Discussion document: Near-surface oceanic temperature gradients. Version 12 January 2012. Available in https://www.ghrsst.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/SSTDefinitionsDiscussion.pdf

Moukomla, S. and Blanken, P.D. 2016. Remote Sensing of the North American Laurentian Great Lakes’ Surface Temperature. Remote Sensing, 8, 286. DOI: : https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8040286

O’Reilly, C.M., Alin, S.R., Plisnier, P-D, Cohen, A.S., McKee, B. A. Climate change decreases aquatic ecosystem productivity of Lake Tanganyika, Africa. Nature, 424, pp, 766-768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01833

O’Reilly, C. M., et al. (2015), Rapid andhighly variable warming of lake surfacewaters around the globe, Geophys. Res.Lett., 42, 10,773–10,781, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066235.

Owen, L., Kosarev, A. N. and Leontiev, O. K.. Caspian Sea. Encyclopedia Britannica, 30 Nov. 2021. Available in https://www.britannica.com/place/Caspian-Sea. Accessed in the 15th February 2022.

Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center (PO.DAAC). 2018. Available online [https://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/] from NASA EOSDIS PO.DAAC, Pasadena, CA, Accessed January 5, 2021

Price, J.C. Using spatial context in satellite data to infer regional scale evapotranspiration. 1990. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 28, 940–948.

Reinart, A., Reinhold, M. 2008. Mapping surface temperature in large lakes with MODIS data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 112 (2), pp. 603-611, ISSN 0034-4257, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.05.015.

Sobrino, J.A.; Julien, Y.; García-Monteiro, S., 2020a. Surface Temperature of the Planet Earth from Satellite Data. Remote Sens. 12, 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12020218

Sobrino, J.A.; García-Monteiro, S.Julien, Y, 2020b. Surface Temperature of the Planet Earth from Satellite Data over the period 2003-2019. Remote Sens. 12(12), 2036. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12122036

Sobrino, J.A.; Julien, Y.; Atitar, M.; Nerry, F. NOAA-AVHRR orbital drift correction from solar zenithal angle data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote sens. 2008, 46, 4014–4019

Stainsby, E.A.,  Winter, J.G. , Jarjanazi, H. , Paterson, A.M. , Evans, D.O., Young, J.D. 2011, Changes in the thermal stability of Lake Simcoe from 1980 to 2008, Journal of Great Lakes Research, 37 (3), pp. 55-62, ISSN 0380-1330, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2011.04.001.

Swain, W.R. and Shannon, V.R. 1980. Proceedings OF THE Second American-Soviet Symposium on the Use of Mathematical Models to Optimize Water Quality Management. United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-300/9-80-033.

Swann, G., Panizzo, V.,  Piccolroaz, S., Pashley, V., Horstwood, Roberts, M., Vologina, E., Piotrowska, N.,   Sturm, M., Zhdanov, A., Granin, N., Norman, C., McGowan, S., Mackay, A.W. Changing nutrient cycling in Lake Baikal, the world’s oldest lake. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 2020, 117 (44) 27211-27217; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013181117

United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2022. Great Lakes Atlas. Physical Facts. Available in /http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/physfacts.html. Accessed in the 15th of February of 2022.

Verburg, P., Hecky, R.E., Kling, H. 2003. Ecological Consequences of a Century of Warming in Lake Tanganyika. Science, 301 (5632), pp. 505-507. DOI: 10.1126/science.1084846

Yongsheng Zhang, T.L., Bin Wang, On the relationship between Indian Ocean sea surface temperature and Asian Summer Monsoon. Geophysical Research Letters, 28(14), pp.2843-2846. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL011847

Zhang, G., Yao, T., Xie, H., Ye, Q., Guo, R. 2014. Estimating surface temperature changes of lakes in the Tibetan Plateau using MODIS LST data. Advancing Earth and Space Science, 119 (14), pp. 8552-8567.

Zimmerman, M.S., Krueger, C.C., Eshenroder, R.L. 2006. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 135 (4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1577/T05-237.1


Citation: Sobrino J.A., García-Monteiro, S. and Julien, Y. An analysis of the Lake Surface Water Temperature evolution of the world’s largest lakes during the years 2003-2020 using MODIS data. Recent Adv. Remote Sens. 1:2024. https://doi.org/10.62880/rars240001

*Corresponding author: José A. Sobrino, sobrino@uv.es

Received: 15 January 2024; Revised: 9 February 2024;Accepted: 28 February 2024; Published: 29 February 2024.

Rights and Permissions This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and not of Recent Advances and/or the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher. The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of Recent Advances S. L. and/or the editor(s). Recent Advances S. L. and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information: Recent Advances remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Exit mobile version